Date and Time:February 18(Monday),2013 10:00-17:00
Venue:Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France
Date and Time:February 19(Tuesday), 2013 9:30-16:30
Venue:Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France
time | content | title | reporter | papers | Power Point |
sound |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
09:30 | 10:40 |
3rd Session | Moderator: Associate Prof. KIM Eonsuk, Nagoya University | ||||
The Aspects on the Articulation between Legal Pluralism and Rule of Law-Meta-theory on the Administrative Law |
Prof. Katsuya ICHIHASHI, Nagoya University | |||||
Towards a non-conflictual legal pluralism | Prof. Alexis VAHLAS, Strasbourg University | |||||
Question and answer | ||||||
11:00 | 12:30 |
4th Session | Moderator: Prof. Noriko OFUJI, Dokkyo University | ||||
The Quest for Harmony in Europe´s Multi-layered System of Fundamental Rights Protection | Mr. Jörg POLAKIEWICZ, Head of the Human Rights Policy and Development, Council of Europe | |||||
Towards a Pluralistic Conception of Human Rights Protection: Kadi, ECJ and the Never-ending´Conundrum of High and Low Standards´ |
Prof. Kaoru OBATA, Nagoya University | |||||
Open Discussion | ||||||
14:00 | 15:00 |
Young researchers´ session 1 | Moderator: Prof. Kaoru OBATA, Nagoya University | ||||
Violence Against Women under the Competence of Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women | Ms. Sotheavy NUTH | |||||
The Evolution of the Competence of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in relation to Statelessness | Mr. Aziz ISMATOV | |||||
Question and answer | ||||||
15:30 | 16:30 |
Young researchers´ session 2 | Moderator: Prof. Danièle Alexandre, Strasbourg University | ||||
Review Security Council Sanctions by National Court? — Implications of Kadi case |
Ms. FAN Xiaomei | |||||
Possibilities and Challenges of the Venice Commission´s Activity in non-Europe | Mr. Toru TAKEUCHI | |||||
Question and answer |
Objective
On the matters relating to human rights and democracy, there are so many differences in the situations between Europe and Japan. Asia, or more exactly, East Asia has no (sub-) regional system for protection and /or promotion of human rights. Japan is a State Party to many of major Human Rights Conventions adopted by the United Nations, but has never accepted the machineries receiving individuals’ complaints.
The Constitution of Japan was adopted in 1946 and entered into force in 1947. Its text and the main-stream interpretations followed the model of liberal-democracy common to the post-war West Europeans. Compared with Germany, for example, the place of the concept of human dignity is not so high, at least on the text. Predominant view is that the judicial review in light of the protection of fundamental rights in the Constitution should be exercised with due regard to the extent of effectiveness of democratic or parliamentary process. We Japanese have no national institution for human rights (NIHR). It means that no governmental mechanism other than the executive or the judiciary exists for protection and/or promotion of human rights.
Europeans have access to one of the most effective regional .mechanisms: the European Court of Human Rights. Most of the cases before the Court relate to right to personal freedoms (Article 5) or right of access to the courts (Article 6). These rights do not so directly affect democratic process of each state as some others such as the right to freedom of opinion or expression.
In sum, formal comparison in actual situations shows big gap between Japan and Europe. If we discuss on facial level, the main line of arguments would be parallel monologs. Substantial comparison is only accomplished in light of the actual contexts of each concept and institution.
Japanese scholars have been much interested in and learned from European situations. But in contrast, no sufficient efforts have been made to secure better understanding of Japanese situations among Europeans. In this Symposium, we would like to introduce Japanese or Asian situations relating to human rights and democracy including their historical and social backgrounds. With correspondent presentations and discussions from the European side, this symposium is expected to be a starting point for more fruitful dialogs with much substance in the future.
Organized by
- Nagoya University Graduate School of Law
- Nagoya University Center for Asian Legal Exchange
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- -Grant-in-Aid project “Toward a Conceptualization on Structure of Constitutionalization of European Regional Order through an Analysis of Implementation of the Human Rights Convention”
- -Strategic Young Researcher Overseas Visits Program for Accelerating Brain Circulation “Aspire to becoming the international node for the study of legal assistance -International joint research for building the theoretical foundation-“
- -International Training Program, “Training Program for Researchers Capable of Disseminating Knowledge on Laws Asian Countries and Legal Assistance Activities in Asia”
- -Program for Leading Graduate School, “The Program for Cross-Border Legal Institution Design”
- -Grants for Excellent Graduate Schools
Auspices
- Japanese Consulate in Strasbourg
- Under the auspices of the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, Mr. Thorbjorn Jagland